Plagiarism Policy

P-ISSN: 3117-5589 | E-ISSN: 3117-5597

Plagiarism & Academic Integrity Policy

Believers Medical Journal (BeMJ) is committed to maintaining academic integrity, responsible authorship, appropriate attribution, and the reliability of published medical research. The journal does not permit plagiarism, misleading text reuse, duplicate publication, inappropriate appropriation of ideas or data, or other practices that may compromise the originality and integrity of scholarly work.

This policy is informed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Core Practices, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) Recommendations, and transparency principles reflected in Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) criteria. Submitted manuscripts may undergo similarity screening and editorial assessment before or during the peer-review process.

Forms of Plagiarism and Unacceptable Practices

Plagiarism includes presenting another person's words, ideas, data, images, methods, or other intellectual contributions as one's own without appropriate acknowledgment. It may occur intentionally or unintentionally.

Unacceptable practices in BeMJ submissions include:

Verbatim copying without appropriate quotation and citation
Inadequate paraphrasing or close imitation of another work's structure
Using another person's ideas without proper attribution
Unauthorized or uncredited reproduction of tables or figures
Translating source material without appropriate attribution
Submitting undisclosed or unverified AI-generated material as original scholarly work

Similarity Screening and Editorial Assessment

Submitted manuscripts may be evaluated using journal-approved similarity-detection software before external peer review or at another appropriate stage of editorial assessment.

  • Similarity screening may form part of the initial editorial evaluation of a manuscript.
  • Editors interpret similarity reports in context rather than relying solely on an automated percentage.
  • Quotations, reference lists, standard terminology, methodological descriptions, and other legitimate areas of textual overlap may be considered during assessment.

Evaluation of Similarity

Similarity percentages are screening indicators and are not treated as automatic evidence of plagiarism or as the sole basis for accepting or rejecting a manuscript. The editorial assessment may consider:

Overall Similarity

The location, nature, extent, and attribution of matched material.

Source-Level Overlap

Substantial copying from a single source may raise an integrity concern even when the overall similarity percentage is relatively low.

Data, Results, Tables, and Figures

Unauthorized duplication, misleading reuse, or unattributed reproduction is not permitted.

Text Recycling and Reuse of Previous Work

Authors must disclose and appropriately cite relevant previous publications arising from the same research.

Substantial reuse of previously published text, data, analyses, tables, or figures requires appropriate attribution, transparency, and permission where applicable. Limited overlap in methodological descriptions may be acceptable when necessary for accurate reporting, but such reuse must not mislead readers about the originality or novelty of the submitted work.

Segmented Publication and Concurrent Submission

Authors should not divide a single study into multiple publications without adequate scientific justification or appropriate cross-reference. Such practices may constitute segmented or salami publication.

Authors must also not submit the same or substantially similar manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously.

Editorial Actions and Integrity Procedures

When plagiarism, inappropriate text recycling, duplicate publication, or another academic-integrity concern is identified before or after publication, BeMJ may take proportionate action based on the available evidence and relevant publication-ethics guidance.

Possible actions include:

  • Requesting clarification or revision
  • Rejecting the manuscript where warranted
  • Applying submission restrictions where justified
  • Publishing a correction, Expression of Concern, or retraction
  • Notifying relevant institutions or funders where appropriate

Post-Publication Plagiarism

If confirmed plagiarism is identified after publication, BeMJ will assess the matter according to the extent and location of the copied material, its potential effect on the reliability of the published article, and the available evidence.

Depending on the circumstances, the journal may publish a Correction, Expression of Concern, Retraction, or another appropriate editorial notice. Where a retraction is issued, the notice will be linked to the affected article and relevant publication metadata will be updated where applicable.

Policy Alignment and Periodic Review

Believers Medical Journal (BeMJ) applies plagiarism and academic-integrity procedures informed by COPE Core Practices, ICMJE Recommendations, and relevant DOAJ transparency principles.

This policy is reviewed periodically and may be updated when necessary to reflect developments in journal procedures, scholarly publishing standards, and similarity-screening practices.

Author Responsibility

Authors remain responsible for the originality and integrity of their submitted work, accurate citation of relevant sources, transparent disclosure of related publications, and obtaining any permissions required for the reproduction of copyrighted tables, figures, or other material.